How a Startup Burned Through $1M — And What the Financials Were Really Saying
- Thinking Ledger
- Jun 14
- 3 min read
Updated: 1 day ago

It’s a classic story in the startup world: promising pitch, big funding round, and then… silence. The money's gone, the momentum fades, and founders are left wondering what went wrong.
We’ve worked with dozens of post-mortem financials, and today, we’re diving into a real-world case (anonymized) where a SaaS startup raised $1 million and still ran out of runway in just 14 months.
The Setup: $1M Seed Round & a Big Vision
This was a SaaS product targeting remote team collaboration — think lightweight Trello meets Slack.
● $1M seed raised from a few angels and a small VC.
● Team of 12 by month 6 (including 2 founders, 6 devs, 2 sales, 2 marketing).
● Goal: Hit $40K MRR within 12 months and raise a Series A.
Burn rate in the first 3 months: ~$70K/month, mostly payroll.
Where It Started to Go Wrong
The financials looked fine at first glance — runway forecast showed 15+ months.
But here’s what deeper analysis revealed:
1. Over-Hiring Without Revenue Justification
● 6 engineers onboarded before even a working MVP.
● Marketing & sales hires before validated ICP (ideal customer profile).
● No cash allocation for customer onboarding or support — leading to churn.
Example Payroll Breakdown:
Role | Monthly Cost | Value at Stage? |
Senior Dev (x3) | $36,000 | 🚫 (Too early) |
Sales Rep (x2) | $12,000 | 🚫 (No ICP yet) |
Marketing Lead | $8,000 | ⚠️ (Misaligned) |
2. Zero Spend on Financial Infrastructure
● No accounting software.
● No forecasting model beyond Google Sheets.
● Founder reviewed cash monthly, not weekly.
● No understanding of gross margin vs. net burn.
At month 9, CAC was 4x LTV and no one noticed.
3. Misreading Growth Signals
● Added $10K MRR in Month 6 → celebrated.
● Lost $5K MRR in Month 7 → brushed off.
● No customer cohort tracking to identify product fit issues.
● Churn reports didn’t exist — just Stripe data dumps.
Churn Rate: 18% monthly — masked by new trial signups.

What the Financials Were Really Saying
If a Fractional CFO or finance lead had reviewed this in Month 3, here’s what they would’ve flagged:
Red Flag | What It Meant |
Payroll = 85% of spend | Unsustainable burn |
CAC > LTV | Growth isn't profitable |
No forecast tied to unit economics | Blind scaling |
No monthly reporting cadence | Trouble brewing unseen |
Cash burn projections not updated | Risk of sudden shortfall |

Simple Financial Visual That Would’ve Saved Them
Here’s a sample graph that could’ve changed everything:
Monthly Cash vs. Burn Forecast
| $1000s
|
| 1000 ──────────────────────────────
| 800 ───────────────────────┐
| 600 ────────────────┐ │
| 400 ────────────────┴──────┴─> Burn rate projection
| 200 ───────┐
| 0 ───────┴─────────────────────> Month
→ Burn rate outpaced their expectations by 40% within 4 months. No course correction.

How a Fractional CFO Could’ve Changed the Story
● Set up unit economics early (CAC, LTV, runway).
● Built a rolling 13-week cash forecast.
● Created financial dashboards + burn alerts.
● Aligned hiring with growth KPIs.
● Flagged risk on MRR quality & churn by Month 5.
Instead of $1M vanishing in 14 months…
→ They could’ve stretched it to 24 months, reached $60K MRR, and raised a successful Series A.

Startup Financial Health Checklist (Quick Self-Test)
Question | Yes / No |
Are your CAC and LTV tracked monthly? | |
Do you know your burn rate and runway? | |
Are hires tied to specific revenue goals? | |
Do you review financials every 2 weeks? | |
Is churn tracked with product feedback? |
→ Score: 4+ “Yes” = On track. Less than 3 = time to revisit your numbers.

Final Word
Most founders don’t fail because of a bad idea. They fail because they couldn’t read the signals their numbers were already giving them.
A good finance partner doesn’t just build spreadsheets — they help you make better decisions, faster.
Want us to review your startup’s numbers? [Get a free financial health scan →]

Opmerkingen